Definition: Blasphemy is communicating contempt, hatred, derision, or disdain toward God.
word origin: Greek blasphēmos < blas- (to curse, bring harm, or treat with contempt) + -pheme (speech)
Blasphemy is verbally abusing the God who loves you, or doing the equivalent actions or gestures.
Some people in many religions believe that blasphemy warrants execution, whether formally or informally-done.
Blasphemy is not about voicing honest anger about God or toward God.
God forgives blasphemy. God also seeks repentance.
Blasphemy isn't about letting loose a swear word or doing some religious act in a so-called "profane" way. It's not even about being angry with God. Even the truest saints have done such things, partly because they were so true that they could be honest with God and humankind. (Remember that when authorities make the charge of so-called 'blasphemy' to silence their opponents.) Blasphemy is use of words to communicate ridicule or hate on God.
Can puny little you hurt the Almighty Creator of the Universe, All Stars and All Time, or his billions of followers? When you were a child, you probably said things that brought your parents to tears and anger. If so, you abused them the way you can abuse God. Or, think of someone you had a close friendship with, but somehow your trust was betrayed. You were close, but bitter words were said and you're now distant and separated. It stings, doesn't it? Blasphemy is when someone does it willfully, with intent and meaning.
God forgives blasphemy, and tries to do something about the separation. But the true blasphemer won't accept that forgiveness, as if to say: "Let me get this right -- you forgive me?? HA !! What nerve!". And so they seal their future. The bigger problem is that too often others join in the harangue, and when that happens, those others are also separated from God.
Blasphemy In the Headlines
In today's Islam, the question of how to punish blasphemy has come to the forefront. Many, even within mainstream Islam, believe that the proper sentence for blasphemy is death. But a large opposing stream of thought says no, the blasphemer is simply to be treated as non-Muslim. (This way of thinking is ancient, dating back hundreds of years, but today is most typical of Muslims who support a secular form of government.) A small minority of Islamic teachers over the years have even claimed that there should be no punishment at all. Increasingly, blasphemy laws are being applied to non-Muslims. In some places (especially, recently in Pakistan), pro-executionists have executed their Muslim opponents for the blasphemy of opposing executions for blasphemy. Christians were once like that, too, as recently as 350 years ago. But that era taught us how destructive that was to society as a whole. The faith itself calls for acts of love rather than hate or anger. Blasphemy is rarely punished among Christians anymore, even within the churches. Even formal action by the churches against blasphemy means much less than it used to. The reported blasphemer is usually free to join some other group or strike an independent path, as so many have done. Non-Muslim governments have for the most part gotten rid of their blasphemy laws.
Definition: teaching untruths about God. Or put another way, a heresy is an idea that warps the truth about God and God's purposes, usually toward an idea held by a leader or sect.
Misspellings: 'herecy', 'hercy', 'heracy', or even 'hearsay'.
Word forms: One who holds to a heresy is called a 'heretic'. One is not a heretic for raising questions or thinking thoughts. One is a heretic for espousing, spreading, and/or teaching a specific answer that is seriously wrong about God.
In Greek, the term 'heresy' was at first simply used to describe the mere taking of sides. As arguments got more contentious, especially in the Judaism of the century before Jesus, all such terms took on a much more polemic meaning. When Christianity formed, it continued that negative understanding.
word origin: Greek hairesis (faction, division, contending group) < haireisthai (to choose, take action, choose a side in a dispute) < hairein (to take)
Why Determine Heresy?
In most religions that have a god, being
truthful about that god is taken very seriously. If God is really supreme, then God deserves the supreme honor of our taking the time and care not to run off rashly at the mouth claiming this or that thing is true about or is done by God, especially not to gain personal fame. This is the root of the concept of heresy.
Early Christian heresies were a bit different. Sure, a few of their leaders made them up to challenge for personal power or fame, but that was actually uncommon. Power was not the heretic's aim because until the Roman emperor Constantine, the Church had little real power. Usually, those who came up with the heretical idea were honestly trying to better understand what Jesus was about. They thought they had succeeded. Then other Christians sifted the idea in detail to see where it led. It wasn't about it being just odd or strange, since there were already odd and strange beliefs held within the Church. They might be merely 'heterodox' - different teachings that are still within the realm of Christian belief. The ideas the early Christians deemed 'heresies' were ones that led people away from the gospel, or led to a counter-Christian theology or practice. Honest probings, unfortunately, can go honestly and seriously off course. The new ideas usually grew from seeing Christian beliefs through the lens of their general culture or some rising group within it. Usually, a heresy gave birth to a sect, a group which was more restrictive than the rest of the Church. The sect would not accept the legitimacy of the more mainstream Christian churches. The struggle over heretical teachings was done mostly within the Church, rather than outside of it, and usually took a generation. The sifting process winnowed out the failed experiments or traps and kept what rang true. The process helped to refine Christian beliefs, and develop a clearer, more mature Christian identity. A 'heresy' describes teachings, the ideas someone spreads around to others, rather than what they kept to themselves. A Christian's actions are matters of 'praxis' treated under personal discipline, or as apostasy. Yet, the reasons they use to justify wrongful actions can be judged heretical.
You can express your viewpoint that certain ideas or practices are indeed heretical (as I myself do in Spirithome.com, regarding dominion theology and the prosperity gospel). But that doesn't mean they are actually formally deemed 'heresies'. That takes a strong consensus generated over the course of more than a generation of watching the idea or its practitioners develop. Beliefs have consequences, and time will help sort out the heresy.
apostasy : [ Greek, 'revolt'; apo- (away from, off) + -(hi)stanai (to stand)] Definition: An apostasy is a defection; abandonment of what one once held or believed. It's when someone makes a clear and public break with an orthodoxy or teaching they once held dear. Often misspelled 'apostacy'. One who commits apostasy is an apostate. It's another of those words (like 'heresy', 'blasphemy', and 'excommunication') that are used by those who have power to stomp on those who have none. Yet the word itself is about a change that happens all too often in real life.
Apostasy and Change
How can one tell the difference between apostasy and just plain change?
Sometimes, change happens when someone finds out that their position has been built upon lies and accusations and anger instead of love and truth, and the truth demands that they rethink what they believe. That's an act of repentance and is thus an important part of following Christ. The switch would be an act of spiritual honesty. It's seen as 'apostasy' by the group that the person leaves, but the person would say that his/her previous position was really an 'apostasy' before God.
Apostasy can happen when someone realizes there is more to gain personally by changing position - most likely, that they'd no longer be on the outside of those they seek to befriend or attract. Sometimes, the switch is made to get a better shot at power or acceptance, or to take advantage of the opportunities of the moment.
'Apostasy' is not a mere change of mind, but a switching of sides, by actually joining what was once perceived as 'the enemy'. It can't be done without ripping apart the good and bad of being on the previous side. That's why it produces such anger. A person can ease their way into apostasy, by not being aware at the time that what they're doing is a switch. Eventually, they begin to adjust to it. Or, one can get there by little nudges and small steps, each taken as part of a journey of thought or of life. But there comes a time when the switch has been made. Turning one's back on the true God is a profoundly negative act, even if done with good motives, because there are no other real gods. The truth matters.
Why Not Call Out Heresy, Apostasy, and Blasphemy?
The early or 'classic' heresies seem hypnotic in how they lead people far astray, into spiritually deluded and destructive beliefs and behaviors. (These heresies keep coming back in new forms, with similar results of belief or practice; for instance, gnosticism.) Thus, a passion for truth is the root of the concept of heresy. The idea of heresy runs into trouble on several fronts, the biggest of which is, 'who determines what is heresy?'. Those in a position of power routinely claim the power to define heresy. Then they use it against all those who challenged their authority, sometimes all the way to murder and war. Even major leaders like John Calvin did it: "Whoever shall maintain that wrong is done to heretics and blasphemers in punishing them makes himself an accomplice in their crime and guilty as they are". If the New Testament is right, such reasoning tells lies about God - and that means they are themselves heretics. And their actions of murder mark them as apostates.
Most religions take apostasy, blasphemy, and heresy seriously. The punishment is usually that the apostate person is no longer counted as part of the group (expulsion), and no longer gets the benefits of taking part in the group's religious actions (excommunication), or even in their non-religious cultural acts (shunning). The normative punishment for apostasy within the Christian tradition is excommunication. We all go through changes in how we view the world around us, and we wonder, doubt, test, probe, evolve, retrace. But there comes a time when doubts and differing ideas harden into personal convictions and are taught and acted upon. At such a time, the body of believers is within its rights to demand spiritual honesty.
The action of how to treat apostates is much like those which are used by ethnic or political groups, clubs, and schools of thought to define their membership circles. Those too can be harsh. For most religions, blasphemy and apostasy are given the stiffest punishments only when the deaths of others are (or may easily be) caused by it. Often the degree of punishments will hinge on:
how fully the person understood their original faith in the first place,
how sane they are, and
whether they are actively spreading their new faith (or lack of faith).
Can We Get Past These Concepts?
If all this punishment-talk sounds harsh, remember that groups have a right to define themselves. They act against those who continue to live the lie that they're still a part of the group when they no longer live like they are. Apostasy is analogous to treason in the affairs of nations, or side affairs in a romantic relationship. Those affairs are taken seriously too. The relationship is often ended. The nation (even those who have no other death penalty) may execute its traitor. Christianity is a religion of mercy and of loving one's enemies, thus killing an apostate is a strongly anti-Christian act. But Christian authorities have killed them, especially in the later Roman Empire and Middle Ages Europe. This points to the main problem with terms like apostasy: those in power will use all available rules to punish their opponents. Christ calls us to love even our enemies - including the apostate who used to be with us.
How can Christians honor the concern behind the concept of heresy, without letting it be a weapon of the powerful? The best way is to have full, frank and open discussion of such matters. This must be done among a people who take seriously their duty to keep testing and prodding, prayerfully applying the Bible and the tools of discernment. And not putting up with any attempt to manipulate the dialogue, whether subtle or up front. Alas, even that doesn't work as well anymore. Today's spiritual frauds excel at manipulating words and images to sell self-serving lies about God. In the free-wheeling online world, there's a lot of folks lying about God.
What Is Excommunication?
Definition: Excommunication is the action of disfellowshipping a person, barring them from holy communion and the other services and privileges of the church community; to expel from a group.
The biblical Greek word for it is anathema. According to the Catholic tradition, they are no longer considered part of the Christian church, and thus will not be a part of God's coming Kingdom.
Excommunicated people can't hold church office, can't teach, can't lead prayers, and often can't even enter church property.
Excommunication was done by most ideologies, nations, religions, and social groups long before Christianity. For Christians, the idea of excommunication has some roots in the Bible. In Matthew 18:15-18, Jesus sets out some steps to be taken when someone of the believing community acts like those who are not. The first step is to talk to the sinner in private. If there is no change, then it is discussed in front of two or three, then to the whole local gathering. If the person does not change, then they are to be treated as what they are: someone whose actions show themselves not to be a part of the group.
The apostle Paul made it clear to the Corinthian church that his call not to associate with immoral people wasn't about the outside world, but about those who supposedly believe but still live in their sin. He warns them not to even eat with such a person. This is drawn from the law of Moses. This may best be taken in the light of 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15, that the banned person is not to be treated as an enemy, but needs to understand the gravity of their disobedience. It's meant as a way of giving them a new chance by letting them know how high the stakes are, how far they have wandered. And it reminds everyone else of what's at stake, too. If the church is defined as being made up of the citizens of the Kingdom, then if you're cast out from the church, especially in Catholic thought, you are not a part of the Kingdom, and when you die, you stay dead. The excommunicated are not considered as being risen with Christ.
Sounds Good, But....
You're probably saying, "sounds sensible, but...". That's a big 'but': 'but' excommunication is done, as often as not, solely to bolster the authority of the leader who orders it. The duty to listen is replaced by the urge to keep power. Such excommunications have caused much injustice within the church. It has cost the church deeply in terms of stifled truth and lessons not learned. Even just the threat of excommunication is enough for evil; for instance, the threat of it led to the betrayal of early Reformer Jan Hus. Excommunication has often been followed by execution.
Excommunication: The Idea Doesn't Go Away
Just about all churches (like most groups of any kind whether religious or not) have some way of throwing people out of the group. And with it comes at least a hint (if not the outright claim) that they've earned God's displeasure and may well roast eternally. If you're saying, 'my church doesn't', you're probably in for a shock. Even when there's no formal way to excommunicate, there are informal ways, and those can be harsh and unjust. It's even used by those who were victims of it. In 1906, Pentecostalist founder William Seymour was locked out of a church he was to preach at. In 1914, he locked someone else out of his Azusa church over a doctrinal dispute that had gotten personal. I as a Lutheran have to cope with how Lutheran hierarchs have stomped on opponents over the years.
It's both a mystery and a paradox. No group can keep its identity and purpose for long when they refuse to set limits and bounds. Do you allow the death squad leader or the Mafia don to mock God by their unrepentant presence and unchanged life? Do you sit quietly as a college professor who speaks out against belief in Jesus as Christ comes forward for the bread and wine every week in a bald-faced hypocrisy? Do you stay silent as a minister tickles the church's ears with deception and sways minds? Yet, do you allow the power of excommunication to be used by the powerful to silence truth and stymie proper discernment from within your ranks? Neither choice is right, yet is any choice right, in the stricter sense of 'right'? The idea behind excommunication lives on despite its rampant abuse. Perhaps one could let truth contend for itself, but our era has bred the best liars of all time. They're so good at it that their trick theologies and well-cloaked deceptions often squeeze out the good. Perhaps all we can do is pray and leave it in God's hands. Or, be as wise as we can be about what we do, and be clear about where we ourselves are on the matter at hand. Then, we can taste a bitter chunk of the grief God gets from dealing with such a twisted species.
It adds up to this:
apostasy is treason against God's followers, and those who do it are apostates.
blasphemy is insulting or blowing off God.
heresy is lying about God, and one who spreads it is a heretic.
excommunication means you teach or take actions as if you don't belong anymore, so it's being made official.
You know it's wrong when it's done to you and those you love. It's even more wrong when it's done to God, the One who least deserves it. That's why no matter how times change, and no matter how often they are used against freedom and against life itself, you can't get away from the ideas that underlie words like 'heresy' and 'apostasy'. For Christians, the response must be fully truthful yet done in the merciful, forgiving manner of Christ, instead of the bloody, oppressive manner of empires and crusades.